ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Home⇛Journal of Education, Management, and Development Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 4 (2022)

Evaluation of Esperanza Seaweeds Culture-Enterprise Federation: A Livelihood Project in Masbate, Philippines

Alvin M. Mahawan | Roger Ibañez Jr. | Jacob Frederick P. Velza

Discipline: agricultural sciences

 

Abstract:

The Seaweeds Culture is one of the livelihood initiatives extended by the FishCORAL Project funded by the United Nations-International Fund for Agricultural Development (UN-IFAD) with the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) to the fishing households in Barangay Rizal and Libertad, Esperanza, Masbate, Philippines. The study aimed to analyze the socioeconomic characteristics of household beneficiaries, identify the different types of livelihood assets, and evaluate the critical livelihood performance of the Esperanza Seaweeds Culture-Enterprise Federation. The study included the twenty-one beneficiaries, and data were treated based on cross-sectional quantitative data gathered through focus group discussion and key informant interviews. Itwas found that the household beneficiaries are mostly potential labor force members. The household income is insufficient, which translates to high poverty incidence. The income and expenditure approach as PSA’s measure of poverty confirmed this. The primary livelihood assets are consumer durables, enterprise federation, credits as significant financial capital, and government transfers associated with buffering mechanisms to sustain the family needs. There is relevance and initial impact, which results in improved livelihood and some improvement inwomen empowerment. The claimed improvement in income could not be associated with project impact as the culture has just started. There are critical challenges to the efficiency and sustainability of the project, especially from the end view of natural and anthropogenic disturbances. These significant risks are appropriately counteracted when the association does have a sustainability plan. The adaptive capacity of the association must be enhanced. Along these ends, BFAR, academe, and other agencies’ technical backstopping are vital.



References:

  1. Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Seymour, G., & Vaz, A. (2013). The women’s empowerment in agriculture index. World Development, 52, 71-91.
  2. Bak, U., Gregersen, Ó., & Infante, J. (2020). Technical challenges for offshore cultivation of kelp species: Lessons learned and future directions. Botanica Marina, 63(4), 341-353.
  3. Bridgman, B. (2016). Home productivity. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 71, 76.
  4. Chen, J., & James, M. (2021, March 20). Financial asset. Investopedia.
  5. Department for International Development. (n.d.). Sustainable guidance sheets.
  6. Dioneda, R. R., Asejo, R. B., Burce, R. B., Balangawan, R. R., & Tumbaga, B. S. (2019). Status of corals and coral reef fishes in Acid Gulf. In R. R. Dioneda, G. A. A. Naz, & E. E. Torres (Eds.), Participatory resource and socio-economic assessment of Asid Gulf (pp. 33-51). Terminal report submitted for the Fisheries, Coastal Resources and Livelihood Project, Department of Agriculture Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Quezon City. Bicol University Center for Policy Studies and Development, Legazpi City.
  7. FishCORAL Project. (n.d.). ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø us. Retrieved July 14, 2021, from
  8. Guiriba, M. A. B., Asejo, R. B., Bron, M. T. B., Espinosa, H. L., Marana, D. N., & Sy, D. N. (2019). Status of seagrass and seaweed communities in Acid Gulf, Philippines. In R. R. Dioneda, G. A. A. Naz, & E. E. Torres (Eds.), Participatory resource and socio-economic assessment of Acid Gulf (pp. 52-69). Terminal report submitted for the Fisheries, Coastal Resources and Livelihood Project, Department of Agriculture Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Quezon City. Bicol University Center for Policy Studies and Development, Legazpi City.
  9. Hayes, A. (2019, July 8). Physical asset. Investopedia.
  10. Kasim, M., et al. (2019). Floating cage: A new innovation of seaweeds culture. Emerging Technologies, Environment and Research for Sustainable Aquaculture.
  11. Kenton, W., & Sonnenshen, M. (2020, September 4). Human capital. Investopedia.
  12. Kim, J., Stekoll, M., & Yarish, C. (2019). Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of open-water seaweed aquaculture in the United States. Phycologia, 58(5), 446-461.
  13. Mailath, G., & Postlewaite, A. (2006). Social assets. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1071-1091.
  14. Mateo, J. P., Campbell, I., Cottier-Cook, E. J., et al. (2020). Analysis of biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of the Philippines. Journal of Applied Phycology, 32, 2009–2022.
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (n.d.). Natural assets. Glossary of statistical terms.
  16. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2020, June 04). Updated 2015 and 2018 full year official poverty statistics.
  17. Rebours, C., Marinho-Soriano, E., Zertuche-González, J. A., et al. (2014). Seaweeds: An opportunity for wealth and sustainable livelihood for coastal communities. Journal of Applied Phycology, 26, 1939–1951.
  18. Sievanen, L., Crawford, B., Pollnac, R., & Lowe, C. (2005). Weeding through assumptions of livelihood approaches in ICM: Seaweed farming in the Philippines and Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48(3-6), 197-313.
  19. Trono, G., & Largo, D. (2019). The seaweed resources of the Philippines. Botanica Marina, 62(5), 483-498.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø