黑料吃瓜网

Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 2 (2025)

Trailblazing Innovation Transformation Through Assistive Approaches for Inclusive Science Education

Ma. Germie F. Gain

Discipline: Development Studies

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the level of innovation in assistive tech-nology (AT) among science teachers in inclusive classrooms, focus-ing on resource allocation and implementation, collaboration measures, technological training, personal professional approach, and adaptability. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered from 36 science teachers through surveys and interviews. The results revealed a high level of innovation overall, with specific strengths and areas for improvement identified. Teachers However, innovated resource allocation and imple-mentation to meet various student requirements. collaboration measures indicated average level of innovation, highlighting the need for systematic teacher collaboration and best practice ex-change. The high rating of technological training shows science teachers' proactive professional development to improve AT skills. Teachers' innovative personal professional approach focused on lifelong learning and creative problem-solving to achieve inclusion. Teachers' adaptability to modify tools and create low-tech solutions for students also scored high, highlighting teachers' ability to mod-ify existing tools and develop low-tech solutions to address specific student needs. The study identified key themes, including resource limitations, technological barriers, administrative and knowledge gaps, and student-centered challenges, that influence teachers' inno-vative use of AT. Based on these findings, a comprehensive training workshop, STEAM AID, was proposed to equip teachers with the skills and knowledge needed to overcome these challenges and foster an in-clusive learning environment.



References:

  1. Adams,  O.  O.,  Onyiyeche,  E.  O.,  &  Bunmi,  J.  O. (2017).  Teachers’  attitude  and  compe-tence  in  the  use  of  assistive  technologies in  special  needs  schools. Acta  Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 21–32.
  2. Allmon, A. (n.d.). What makes an innovative ed-ucator? –NETA  |  Nebraska  Educational Technology  Association.  Retrieved  from
  3. Batanero, J. M. F., Rueda, M. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). As-sistive technology for the inclusion of stu-dents  with  disabilities:  A  systematic  re-view. Educational   Technology   Research and    Development,    70(5),    1911–1930.
  4. Burns, E., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Ex-amining  the  yields  of  growth  feedback from science teachers and students’ in-trinsic valuing of science: Implications for student- and school-level science achieve-ment. Journal of Research in Science Teach-ing, 56(8), 1060–1082.
  5. Byrd, A., & León,  R. (2017). Assistive technolo-gies:  Learning  resources  to  promote  the inclusion  and  communication  of  students with  disabilities. Nuevos Escenarios  De  La Comunicación, 2(1), 167–178.
  6. Canlé,  A.  J.  (2020,  August  3).  Making  PD  more meaningful through personalization. Edutopia.
  7. Clark,  V.  L.  P.  (2019).  Meaningful  integration within  mixed  methods  studies:  Identify-ing why, what, when, and how. Contempo-rary Educational Psychology, 57, 106–111.
  8. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’  perceived  autonomy  support and   adaptability:   An   investigation   em-ploying the job demands-resources model as  relevant  to  workplace  exhaustion,  dis-engagement,  and  commitment. Teaching and    Teacher    Education,    74,    125–136.
  9. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., Martin, A. J., Burns, E., &    Holliman,    A.    (2020).    Adaptability among   science   teachers   in   schools:   A multi-nation  examination  of  its  role  in school  outcomes. Teaching  and  Teacher Education, 95, 103148.
  10. Gómez, J. G., Torrado, J. C., & Montoro, G. (2017). Using  smartphones  to  assist  people  with Down  Syndrome  in  their  labour  training and  integration:  A  case  study. Wireless Communications  and  Mobile  Computing, 2017, 1–15.
  11. Goodwin, B.,  Hall, P., &  Simeral,  A. (2019). Per-sonalizing  professional  development:  How empowered  teachers  can  take  charge  of professional  learning  and  growth.McREL International.
  12. Green,  C.  (2023).  Tailoring  learning  for  teach-ers:  The  power  of  personalized  profes-sional    development. Michigan    Virtual.
  13. Gulzar, A. A. (2021). Challenges  and barriers to inclusive   education.Educare.   Retrieved from https://educarepk.com/challenges-and-barriers-to-inclusive-education.html
  14. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2017, March).  Intelligent  tutors  as  teachers’ aides:  Exploring  teacher  needs  for  real-time  analytics  in  blended  classrooms.  In Proceedings  of  the  Seventh  International Learning  Analytics  &  Knowledge  Confer-ence(pp. 257–266).
  15. ACM.Johnson,  J.  S.,  &  Schneiderwind,  J.  (2020).  Why are  students  with  disabilities  so  invisible in  STEM  education?  (Opinion). Education Week.
  16. Kalyani,  D.,  &  Rajasekaran,  K.  (2018).  Innova-tive  teaching  and  learning. Journal  of  Ap-plied  and  Advanced  Research,  3(S1),  S23–S25.
  17. Kolonich, A., Richmond, G., & Krajcik, J. (2018). Reframing inclusive science instruction to support  teachers  in  promoting  equitable three-dimensional    science    classrooms. Journal    of    Science    Teacher    Education, 29(8), 693–711.
  18. Korozi, M., Leonidis, A., Ntoa, S., Arampatzis, D., Adami,  I.,  Antona,  M.,  &  Stephanidis,  C. (2018). Designing an augmented tabletop game  for  children  with  cognitive  disabili-ties: The “Home game” case. British  Jour-nal of Educational Technology, 49(4), 701–716.
  19. Livingston,  K.,  O’Sullivan,  C.,  &  Attard,  K. (2023). Characteristics  and  conditions  for innovative teachers.Routledge.
  20. Loughland,  T.,  &  Alonzo,  D.  (2019).  Teacher adaptive  practices:  A  key  factor  in  teach-ers’  implementation  of  assessment  for learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Ed-ucation, 44(7), 18–30.
  21. Lynch, M. (2018, July 16). 10 Characteristics of an  innovative  classroom  (Opinion). Edu-cation Week.
  22. Martin, A. J., Granziera, H., & Collie, R. J. (2018). Being  able  to  adapt  in  the  classroom  im-proves teachers’ well-being. The  Conver-sation.
  23. Mina, C. D. (2013). Employment of persons with disabilities in the Philippines: The case  of Metro Manila and Rosario, Batangas. Phil-ippine  Institute  for  Development  Studies.
  24. National  Center  for  Science  and  Engineering Statistics.   (2023). Diversity   and   STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disa-bilities.https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23315/report/the-stem-workforce
  25. Pujaningsih, P., Wahab, R., & Praptiningrum, N. (2021).  Barriers  in  teaching  science  to students  with  special  needs:  Exploration from teachers’ perspectives. KnE  Social Sciences.
  26. Ramos, T. (2023). Challenges for teachers in spe-cial-needs-inclusive classrooms.https://wehavekids.com/education/Top-Challenges-Teacher-Face-in-Special-Needs-Inclusive-Classrooms
  27. Udu,  D.  A.  (2018).  Innovative  practices  in  sci-ence  education:  A  panacea  for  improving secondary  school  students’  academic achievement  in  science  subjects  in  Nige-ria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 23.
  28. Zwarych,  F.  (n.d.). Inclusive  education  with  as-sistive technology.Pressbooks.  

Tools


Copyright © 2026   黑料吃瓜网