黑料吃瓜网

Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 20 no. 10 (2024)

Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Constructivist Approach on Learning Motivation of Learners: A Moderation Analysis

Michelle Rizaldo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The current study was set evaluate whether teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge have significant moderating effect on the interaction between constructivist approach and learning motivation of learners. In this study, the researcher selected the 196 public elementary school teachers in Cateel 2 District, Davao Oriental as the respondents of the study. Stratified random sampling technique was utilized in the selection of the respondents. Nonexperimental quantitative research design using descriptive-correlational method was employed. The data collected were subjected on the following statistical tools: Mean, Pearson Moment Product Correlation, and Heirarchical Regression Analysis. Descriptive analysis showed that teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge and learning motivation of learners were described as extensive, while, teachers’ constructivist approach was rated as moderately extensive. Further, correlation analysis demonstrated that there is significant relationship among teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge, constructivist approach, and learning motivation of learners. Evidently, heirarchical regression analysis proved that teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge have significant moderating effect on the interaction between teachers’ constructivist approach and learning motivation of learners. In other words, teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge is a significant moderator on the interaction between constructivist approach and learning motivation of learners in Cateel 2 District, Davao Oriental.



References:

  1. Agbabi, C. O., Onyeike, V. C., & Wali, W. I. (2013). Classroom management: A practical approach. University of Port Harcourt press.
  2. Agsalog, M. (2019). Experiential learning approach: Its effects on the academic performance and motivation to learn physics of grade  10 students. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 9(9), 844-850. Retrieved from 
  3. Ahmad, C. N. C., Ching, W. C., Yahaya, A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2015). Relationship between constructivist learning  environments and educational facility in science classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1952–1957.  Retrieved from : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.672 
  4. Akomolafe , C., & Adesua, V. (2015). The classroom environment: A major motivating factor towards high academic performance of  senior secondary school students in South West Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 17-21. Retrieved from 
  5. Akomolafe, C., & Adesua, V. (2015). The classroom environment: A major motivating factor towards high academic performance of  senior secondary school students in South West Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice. Retrieved from 
  6. Albalate, A., Larcia, H., & Jaen, J. (2018). Students’ motivation towards science learning of STEM students of University of Batangas,  Lipa City. Retrieved from  
  7. Alkin, S. (2013). Evaluation of elementary school teachers’ behaviors of supporting critical thinking. Unpublished doctoral thesis,  Ankara University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara
  8. Alsaleh, N. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,  19(1), 21-39. Retrieved from  
  9. Alt, D. (2014). Contemporary constructivist practices in higher education settings and academic motivational factors. Australian  Journal of Adult Learning, 56(3), 374-400. Retrieved from  
  10. Alt谋nda臒, M., & Senemo臒lu, N. (2013). Metacognitive skills scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(1), 15–26.  Retrieved from
  11. Alzahrani, I., & Woollard, J. (2013). The role of the constructivist learning theory and collaborative learning environment on  wiki classroom, and the relationship between them. Retrieved from
  12. Andressa, H., Mavrikaki, E., & Dermitzaki, I. (2015). Adaptation of the students’ motivation towards science learning  questionnaire to measure Greek students’ motivation towards biology learning. International Journal Of Biology Education, 4(2),  12-21. Retrieved from
  13. Aregu, B. (2013). A study of self-regulated learning strategies as predictors of critical reading. Retrieved from  D41499
  14. Aurah, C. (2017). Investigating the relationship between science self-efficacy beliefs, gender, and academic achievement, among  high school students in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 146-153. Retrieved from
  15. Bas, G. (2013). Students’ views on the constructivist learning environment in elementary schools: A qualitative inquiry. Cukurova  University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(2), 64–86. Retrieved from universitesi-egitim-fakulte si-dergisi/42/2/students-views-constructivist-learning-environment-eleme ntary-schools qualitative-inquiry/arid/166e54c8-7b6b-4069
  16. Basheer, A. N. A. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions about constructivist learning in Afghan Schools. Mathematics teachers’  perceptions and usage of question-answer, individual and group work methods considering constructivism. Retrieved from 
  17. Bawa, N., & Zubairu, S. (2015). Constructivism and classroom interaction. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 4(2), 71- 81. Retrieved from
  18. 4xG0GShqTPF 
  19. Bay, E., Bagceci, B., & Cetin, B. (2013). The effects of social constructivist approach on the learners’ problem solving and  metacognitive levels. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 343-349. Retrieved from  
  20. Blazar, D. (2016). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Academic Performance, Attitudes, and Behaviors. Retrieved  from TATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1
  21. Bramucci, A. (2013). Self-regulated learning. Theories and potential applications in didactics. Retrieved from tutor.eu/files/2012/06/I-TUTOR_supportmaterial_self-reg ulated_learning_EN.pdf
  22. Brown, B. (2014). The impact of self-Efficacy and motivation characteristics on the academic achievement of upward bound  participants. Retrieved from tions
  23. Brown, P., Mccord, R., Matusovich, H., & Kajfez, R. (2014). The use of motivation theory in engineering education research: A  systematic review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 1-20. Retrieved from 
  24. Cavas, P. (2012). Factor affecting the motivation of turkish primary students for science learning. Science Education International,  22(1), 31-42. Retrieved from
  25. Chan, Y. L., & Norlizah, C. H. (2017). Students’ motivation towards science learning and students’ science achievement.  International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(4), 174-189. Retrieved from 
  26. Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school students’ motivation and achievement in combined science. US-China 
  27. Cirik, I., Colak, E., & Kaya, D. (2013). Constructivist learning environment: The teachers and students perspectives.  International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(2), 30-44. Retrieved from   
  28. Clark, T. D. (2014). How to manage stress in college. Volume one. Publication, TDC Enterprise. Chicago. USA. Retrieved from College-Study-Skills-and-Still-Have-Loads-Of-Fun Vol-1/pdf?dl&preview
  29. Clinkenbeard, P.R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools,  49(7), 622-630. Retrieved from
  30. Cooper, K., & White, R. (2012). Qualitative research in the post-modern era: Contexts of qualitative research. Retrieved from 
  31. Cunningham, K. R. (2013). The effect of motivation on student success in a first-year experience course. Retrieved from  =dis
  32. Evans, C. (2014). Exploring the use of a deep approach to learning with students in the process of learning to teach. Retrieved from 
  33. Fenning, B., & May, L. (2013). Where there is a will, there is an A: Examining the roles of self-efficacy and self-concept in  college students’ current educational attainment and career planning. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 21-30. Retrieved  from
  34. Fox, J., & Schirrmacher, R. (2012). Art and creative development for young children. Retrieved from 
  35. Gee, J. (2013). Importance of prior knowledge to learning. Retrieved from prior-knowledge-to-le arning/
  36. Gibbens, B. (2019). Measuring student motivation in an introductory biology class. Retrieved from 
  37. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2013). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with  science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. Retrieved from 
  38. Granito, M., & Chernobilsky, E. (2012). The effect of technology on a student’ s motivation and knowledge retention.  Retrieved from xt=nera_2012
  39. Gurses, A., Demiray, S., & Dogar, C. (2015). A design practice for interactive- direct teaching based on constructivist learning  (IDTBCL): Dissolution and solutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 44-49. Retrieved from :  10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.244
  40. Harding, S. M. (2019). Self-regulated learning as a predictor of mathematics and reading performance: A picture of students in  Grades 5 to 8. Retrieved from
  41. Hubert, B. (2017). Cognitive self鈥恟egulation and social functioning among French children: A longitudinal study from  kindergarten to first grade. Retrieved from
  42. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons: A Journal of  Literacy and Language Arts, 52(4), 375-398. Retrieved from  =reading_horizons
  43. Isaacs, L. A. (2013). Social constructivism and collaborative learning in social networks: The case of an online masters programme in  adult learning. Retrieved from
  44. Kelly, E. M. (2014). The relationship between reader’s prior knowledge and comprehension of expository texts. Retrieved from  ce=1
  45. Kober N. (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering.  Retrieved from
  46. Kubischta, F. (2014). Engagement and motivation: Questioning students on study motivation, engagement and study strategies.  Retrieved from e%20Final.pdf;sequence=1
  47. Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2014). The constructivist classroom learning environment and its associations with critical thinking  ability of secondary school students in liberal studies. Learning Environments Research, 17, 191–207. Retrieved from 
  48. Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Sciences, 31, 491-495. Retrieved from
  49. Laurillard D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge,  New York and London. E-book.
  50. Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Retrieved  from
  51. Lemley, J. B., Schumacher, G. & Vesey, W. (2014). What learning environments best address 21st -century students’ perceived needs  at the secondary level of instruction? NASSP Bulletin, 98(2), 101-125.
  52. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E., & Pektrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and  principles for instructional design. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228–236. Retrieved from  nenbrink
  53. GarciaPatallPekrun_ClimateMotiveEmo.pdf
  54. Llego, J. (2017). Classroom management approach of STE science teachers in Region 1 Philippines. Imperial Journal of  Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR). Retrieved from
  55. Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2012). Changing objects in knowledge-creation practices. Retrieved from  /9780203847817-19
  56. Mbatha, S. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy, motivation, and academic performance among students from various  gender and generational groups. Retrieved from 
  57. McDougall, J. (2015). The quest for authenticity: A study of an online discussion forum and the needs of adult learners.  Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 94-113. Retrieved from
  58. Michaelis, J. (2015). The role of interest and motivation in science investigation and engineering design instruction. Retrieved  from
  59. Milner, A. R., Templin, M. A., & Czerniak, C. M. (2012). Elementary science students’ motivation and learning strategy use:  Constructivist classroom contextual factors in a life science laboratory and a traditional classroom.Journal of Science Teacher  Education, 22(2), 151-170. Retrieved from
  60. Mohammed Y. (2012). The dynamics of student participation in classroom: Observation on level and forms of participation.  Retrieved from
  61. Mubeen, S., & Reid, N. (2014). The measurement of motivation with science students. European Journal of Educational Research,  3(3), 129-144. Retrieved from
  62. Mutlu, G. & Güler, C. (2017). Authentic instruction: EFL teachers’ perspectives. Paper presented at the European Conference  on Educational Research (ECER 2017) of the European Educational Research Association, Denmark, Copenhagen. Retrieved  from  
  63. Ndon, U. (2012). Hybrid-context instructional model: The internet and the classrooms: The way teachers experience it.  Information Age Publishing Inc. The USA.
  64. Nevid, J. (2011). Teaching Millennials: Association for Psychological Science. Retrieved from  . WNEoi2997IW
  65. Obijiaku, U. J. (2015). Effective time management for Haaga-Helia UAS International students Porvoo Campus. Retrieved from 
  66. Ozerem, A., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Learning environments designed according to learning styles and its effects on  mathematics achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 61-80. Retrieved from 
  67. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Retrieved from 
  68. Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2012). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14, 1-32. 
  69. Ruey, S. (2012). A case study of constructivist strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology,  41( 5), 706-720. Retrieved from
  70. Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of  Education and Learning, 1(2), 12-17. Retrieved from
  71. Savas, . B., & Gurel, R. (2014). The variable affecting the success of students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(1),41-50.  Retrieved from  
  72. Sever, M., Ulubey, Ö., Toraman, Ç., & Türe, E. (2014). An analysis of high school students’ classroom engagement in relation  to various variables. Education and Science, 39(176), 183-198. Retrieved from
  73. Soyogul, E. C. (2015). Students’ motivational beliefs and and learning strategies: An investigation of the scholar  development program. Retrieved from
  74. Svobodová, L. (2015). Factors affecting the motivation of secondary school students to learn the English language. Retrieved  from
  75. Taylor, E. (2014). The correlation between self-efficacy and the academic success of students. Retrieved from 
  76. Teacher Vison (2016). Cooperative Learning. Retrived from lear ning?page=3
  77. Temli-Durmu艧, Y. (2016). Development of classroom management scale for science teachers. Universal Journal of Educational  Research 4(9), 1950-1957. Retrieved from
  78. Tomlinson, C., & Jarvis, J. M. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from  ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 191–219.  Retrieved from
  79. Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards  science learning. Retrieved from
  80. Tunca, N. (2015). The regression level of constructivist learning environment characteristics on classroom environment  characteristics supporting critical thinking. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 181- 200. Retrieved from 
  81. Wood, R. (2019). Students’ Motivation to Engage with Science Learning Activities through the Lens of Self-Determination  Theory: Results from a Single-Case School-Based Study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,  15(7), 8-29. Retrieved from
  82. Yildirim, M. C. (2014). Developing a scale for constructivist learning environment management skills. Eurasian Journal of  Educational Research, 54, 1-18. Retrieved from
  83. Yliportimo, T. (2016). Students’ meaningful learning experiences during an outdoor course in Chile. Retrieved from  i%3Ajyu-201606213288.pdf
  84. Zeidan A. H., & Jayosi, M. R. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among Palestinian secondary school  students. World Journal of Education, 5(1), 14-24. Retrieved from
  85. Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2012). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of  Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1189-1212. Retrieved from 9255-y

Tools


Copyright © 2026   黑料吃瓜网