黑料吃瓜网

Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 8 (2025)

An Overview of Decentralized Cooperative Learning Strategies (Dec-LS) in Enhancing Student Proficiencyin Solving Quadratic Equations

Rizelle Anne Marisse V. Andaya | Christian A. Flores

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This literature study examined how Decentralized Cooperative Learning Strategies (DeC-LS) can enhance students' ability to solve quadratic equations. DeC-LS encourages collaborative learning, where students work together in small groups, take charge of their education, and share information to solve Mathematics problems. The review suggests that DeC-LS enhances student involvement, problem-solving abilities, and conceptual comprehension, making it an effective method for studying complex mathematical concepts. However, barriers to the successful implementation of DeC-LS include issues with classroom management, technological limitations, cultural resistance to nontraditional methods, and a lack of professional development for teachers. The evaluation advocates for the provision of sufficient resources, educator training, and institutional backing to facilitate the adoption of more student-centered, interactive pedagogical approaches. Confronting these problems will cultivate more inclusive and effective educational settings, hence improving student performance in mathematics, especially in the resolution of quadratic equations.



References:

  1. Abramczyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296–308.
  2. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Unveiling the complexities of ‘Abstract Algebra’ in university mathematics education (UME): Fostering ‘conceptualization and understanding’ through advanced pedagogical approaches. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2355400.
  3. Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The contribution of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory in mediating L2 knowledge co-construction. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 12(10).
  4. Almasri, F. (2021). Collaborative learning in science education: Effects of students’ gender attitudes and achievement in science education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick.
  5. Arsenis, P., Flores, M., & Petropoulou, D. (2022). Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 245–258.
  6. Arsyad, M., Guna, S., & Barus, S. (2024). Enhancing chemistry education through problem-based learning: Analyzing student engagement, motivation, and critical thinking. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 2(3), 110–117.
  7. Attardi, S. M., Mintz, N. M., & Rogers, K. A. (2022). Perspectives of online anatomy teachers: A neglected study population struggles with the invisible student. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(2), 233–248.
  8. Balasubramanian, K. (2023). Teacher roles in facilitating effective peer-to-peer learning: Strategies and guidelines. Thiagarajar College of Preceptors Edu Spectra, 5(2), 1–5.
  9. Bangara, M. R. (2022). Learner-centered teaching: Factors of implementation in a Chinese-American community (Doctoral dissertation). Azusa Pacific University.
  10. Baybayon, G. G., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2024). Students’ common errors in quadratic equations: Towards improved mathematics performance. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 83–98.
  11. Berlinghoff, W. P., & Gouvêa, F. Q. (2020). Math through the ages: A gentle history for teachers and others (Expanded 2nd ed., Vol. 32). American Mathematical Society.
  12. Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602.
  13. Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546.
  14. Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar9.
  15. Ciharova, M., Furukawa, T. A., Efthimiou, O., Karyotaki, E., Miguel, C., Noma, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2021). Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: A network meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(6), 563.
  16. Cojorn, K., & Sonsupap, K. (2024). A collaborative professional development and its impact on teachers' ability to foster higher order thinking. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 561–569.
  17. Cruz, R. T., & Salazar, M. G. (2025). Empowering learners through decentralized cooperative learning in algebra: A focus on quadratic equations. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 30(2), 134–150.
  18. Dewey, A., Fletcher, J., & Mills, J. (2023). Teacher readiness for implementing cooperative and decentralized learning models: Challenges and opportunities. Education, 144(2), 123–135.
  19. Fadzil, N. M., & Osman, S. (2025). Scoping the landscape: Comparative review of collaborative learning methods in mathematical problem-solving pedagogy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0820.
  20. Fateh, S., Ayangbola, O. T., Reid, J. W., Zakher, S. W., Kirbulut Gunes, Z. D., Phelps, A. J., & Rushton, G. T. (2024). Small group conversations in a POGIL-based class: How English learners engage in a joint knowledge construction process to reach a shared understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 741–752.
  21. Goh, E., & Sigala, M. (2020). Integrating information & communication technologies (ICT) into classroom instruction: Teaching tips for hospitality educators from a diffusion of innovation approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(2), 156–165.
  22. Hennessy, S., D'Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080.
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021). Learning together and alone: The history of our involvement in cooperative learning. In Pioneering perspectives in cooperative learning (pp. 44–62). Routledge.
  24. Lee, H. J., Kim, S. Y., & Park, Y. S. (2023). Student-led learning groups in secondary algebra: Effects on engagement and performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102137.
  25. Litster, K., MacDonald, B., & Shumway, J. F. (2020). Experiencing active mathematics learning: Meeting the expectations for teaching and learning in mathematics classrooms. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2), 615–640.
  26. Loc, N. P., Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., & Ngoi, H. T. (2020). A teaching process of fostering students’ problem-solving skills: A case study of teaching the equation of a line. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1741–1751.
  27. Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 403–424.
  28. Ly, T., & Takuya, B. (2023). Analysis of Cambodian students’ errors in solving quadratic function problems using Newman’s error analysis. Cambodian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 32–44.
  29. Macachor, M. C. R., & Morados, P. J. (2024). Investigation of Grade 9 students’ errors in solving quadratic equations in one variable. Puissant, 5, 2114–2140.
  30. Mancilla, R., & Frey, B. (2020). A model for developing instructional design professionals for higher education through apprenticeship. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2), 1–8.
  31. Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02105.
  32. Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348.
  33. Namaziandost, E., Gilakjani, A. P., & Hidayatullah. (2020). Enhancing pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension through the use of Jigsaw technique. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1738833.
  34. Nguyen, L. T., & Kulm, G. (2020). Improving algebraic reasoning through cooperative learning models. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 145–164.
  35. Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID鈥�19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376.
  36. Panggabean, F. M., Barus, P. N. B., Tobing, R. A. A. L., & Marbun, R. (2024). The role of teacher as a learning facilitators in 21st century education. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah Transformatif, 8(12).
  37. Patel, R., Gomez, A., & Liang, C. (2023). Digital decentralization in cooperative learning: Impacts on math education. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 24.
  38. Prediger, S., Barzel, B., Hußmann, S., & Leuders, T. (2021). Towards a research base for textbooks as teacher support: The case of engaging students in active knowledge organization in the KOSIMA project. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1–16.
  39. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391.
  40. Rahardja, U., Ngadi, M. A., Budiarto, R., Aini, Q., Hardini, M., & Oganda, F. P. (2021). Education exchange storage protocol: Transformation into decentralized learning platform. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 782969). Frontiers Media SA.
  41. Reid O’Connor, B., & Norton, S. (2024). Exploring the challenges of learning quadratic equations and reflecting upon curriculum structure and implementation. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(1), 151–176.
  42. Revenko, I., Sosnova, M., Kolodina, L., Hlianenko, K., & Vlasenko, R. (2024). The exploration of pedagogical approaches and methods that are designed to stimulate the creative thinking of students. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society (BRAJETS), 137–146.
  43. Ruijuan, L., Srikhoa, S., & Jantharajit, N. (2023). Blending of collaborative and active learning instructional methods to improve academic performance and self-motivation of vocational students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(4), 130–135.
  44. Sannigrahi, S., Raj, M. B., Seenappa, B., Sharma, A. A., Reddy, S., Nobbay, E., Kant, A., Kumar, S., Dhailwal, B., Ganapathi, L., & Shet, A. (2025). “I can be a source of motivation”: Perspectives from stakeholders of the I’m Possible fellowship, a peer-led differentiated service delivery model for adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV in India. medRxiv.
  45. Shakerian, S., Khoshgoftar, Z., Rezayof, E., & Amadi, M. (2020). The use of the Jigsaw cooperative learning technique for the health science students in Iran: A meta-analysis. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 9(1), 1–8.
  46. Silalahi, T. F., & Hutauruk, A. F. (2020). The application of cooperative learning model during online learning in the pandemic period. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(3), 1683–1691.
  47. Silva, H., Lopes, J., Morais, E., & Dominguez, C. (2023). Fostering critical and creative thinking through the cooperative learning jigsaw and group investigation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 261–282.
  48. Singh, A., Sharma, S., & Paliwal, M. (2021). Adoption intention and effectiveness of digital collaboration platforms for online learning: The Indian students’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(4), 493–514.
  49. Singh, A., Sinha, S., Verma, S. B., & Singh, B. K. (2024). Benefits and challenges of decentralization in education for resource optimization and improved performance. In Decentralized Systems and Distributed Computing (pp. 163–187).
  50. Siregar, H. A., Ompusunggu, A., Pangaribuan, D., Tumangger, R. R., Zega, E. A., Panjaitan, Y., & Sinaga, L. A. (2024). Development of cooperative learning model in increasing students' interest in learning. International Journal of Advanced Academic, 60–66.
  51. Sujatha, S., & Vinayakan, K. (2022). The role of collaborative learning in mathematics education: A review of research and practice. Indo American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Review, 6(2), 200–206.
  52. Tadesse, T., Ware, H., Asmare, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2024). Enhancing student engagement and outcomes: The effects of cooperative learning in an Ethiopian University’s classrooms. Education Sciences, 14(9), 975.
  53. Trabelsi, Z., Alnajjar, F., Parambil, M. M. A., Gochoo, M., & Ali, L. (2023). Real-time attention monitoring system for classroom: A deep learning approach for student’s behavior recognition. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 48.
  54. Tran, V. D., & Lewis, R. B. (2021). A meta-analysis of cooperative learning effects on mathematics achievement. Educational Review, 73(2), 234–251.
  55. Virvidaki, A., Milakis, E. D., Argyrakou, C. C., Vasilara, A., Bampouli, I., & Charalampidis, G. (2024). Decentralization dynamics and their impact on special education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 16(1), 10–48047.
  56. Vives, E., Poletti, C., Robert, A., Butera, F., Huguet, P., ProFAN Consortium, & Régner, I. (2024). Learning with Jigsaw: A systematic review gathering all the pieces of the puzzle more than 40 years later. Review of Educational Research.
  57. Wang, M. T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2020). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 419–433.
  58. Wilkie, K. J. (2024). Creative thinking for learning algebra: Year 10 students’ problem solving and problem posing with quadratic figural patterns. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101550.
  59. Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11.
  60. Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718–728.
  61. Yang, K. B., Echeverria, V., Lu, Z., Mao, H., Holstein, K., Rummel, N., & Aleven, V. (2023, April). Pair-up: Prototyping human-AI co-orchestration of dynamic transitions between individual and collaborative learning in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17).
  62. Zitha, I., Mokganya, G., & Sinthumule, O. (2023). Innovative strategies for fostering student engagement and collaborative learning among extended curriculum programme students. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1196.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   黑料吃瓜网