黑料吃瓜网

Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 10 (2025)

A Pragma-Semiotic Analysis of Emoji Usage in Facebook Anniversary Posts Across Generations

Precious Joan B. Abe | Richelle Anne T. Apitan | Febbie Faith S. Ramos

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

In today鈥檚 modern digital landscape, emojis have become a vital tool for expressing emotions and enhancing online communication. This study examines how various generational groups, specifically Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z, utilize emojis in Facebook anniversary posts, highlighting the dynamic nature of digital expression across generations. The research aims to identify common patterns in the use of emojis, as well as their communicative functions, to recognize generational preferences and digital literacy. Using the qualitative pragma-semiotic approach, 60 Facebook posts were analyzed to examine the interaction between texts and emojis. Guided by Language Variation Theory and the Pragma-Semiotic Model of Communication, the study classified pragmatic functions, including tone modification, action representation, and aesthetic enhancement. Meanwhile, emojis served emotive, phatic, and decorative roles across generations. Findings reveal that while all generations use emojis to convey affection, humor, and cultural nuance, Gen Z expresses the most diverse and nuanced applications. Millennials balance emoji and text effectively, whereas Gen X tends toward minimal and straightforward usage. These generational variations underscore the role of emoji in shaping interpersonal and cultural communication. The study results suggest practical insights for educators across all levels, communicators, and digital users on the significance of emoji literacy for achieving effective online interaction and cultivating cross-generational understanding.



References:

  1. Alharbi, A., & Mahzari, M. (2023). The pragmatic functions of emojis in Arabic tweets. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  2. Ali-Chand, Z., & Naidu, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of emojis on paralanguage in social media communication among university students. English Language Teaching, 17(9), 1–84.
  3. Al-Kuwari, A. S. (2019). Comparative analysis for the use of emojis on social media amongst generation X and generation Y (master’s thesis, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar).
  4. Alshenqeeti, H. (2016). Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7, 56-69.
  5. Azad, I., Chhibber, S., & Tajhizi, A. (2023). How do different generations communicate on social media? A comparative analysis of language styles, emoji usage, and visual elements. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 1(2), 86–97.  
  6. An, J., Li, T., Teng, Y., & Zhang, P. (2018). Factors influencing emoji usage in smartphone mediated communications. In Transforming Digital Worlds (pp. 423-428). SpringerLink.
  7. Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. frontiers in psychology, 10.
  8. Bayley, R., & Cameron, R. (2019). Variationist sociolinguistics. Linguistics. communication. Arnold; Oxford University Press.
  9. Boutet, I., Goulet-Pelletier, J. C., Sutera, E., & Meinhardt-Injac, B. (2024). Are older adults adapting to new forms of communication? A study on emoji adoption across the adult lifespan. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100379.
  10. Boutet, I., LeBlanc, M., Chamberland, J. A., & Collin, C. A. (2021). Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106722.
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13, 201–216.
  12. Chen, J. (2023). The use of emojis on social media platforms in facilitating inter-cultural communication. Media and Communication Research.
  13. Cramer, H., De Juan, P., & Tetreault, J. (2016). Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging. In proceedings of the 18th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, (pp. 504–509).
  14. Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  15. Dharma, H. R., Desak, G. F., & Kariko, A. A. (2022). The analysis of emojis’ usage from Japanese generation perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
  16. Dolot, D., & Opina, A. (2021). Forms and functions of graphicons in facebook private conversations among young Filipino users. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(6), 62–73.
  17. Emojipedia — Home of Emoji Meanings. (N.D.). Emojipedia.   Retrieved from
  18. Erle, T. M., Schmid, K., Goslar, S. H., & Martin, J. D. (2022). Emojis as social information in digital communication. Emotion, 22(7), 1529–1543.
  19. Fischer, B., & Herbert, C. (2021). Emoji as affective symbols: Affective judgments of emoji, emoticons, and human faces varying in emotional content. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
  20. Gesselman, A., Ta, V., & Garcia, J. (2019). Worth a thousand interpersonal words: Emoji as affective signals for relationship-oriented digital communication. PLoS ONE, 14.
  21. Gibson, W., Huang, P., & Yu, Q. (2018). Emoji and communicative action: The semiotics, sequence, and gestural actions of ‘face covering hand’. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 91–99. 
  23. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15.
  24. Guntuku, S., Li, M., Tay, L., & Ungar, L. (2019). Studying cultural differences in emoji usage across the East and the West. ArXiv, abs/1904.02671.
  25. Heidari, A. (2023). Emoji. Screen bodies.
  26. Herring, S., & Dainas, A. (2017). “Nice picture comment!” Graph icons in facebook comment threads.
  27. Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2020). Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. Transactions on Social Computing.
  28. Jaeger, S., Jin, D., Ryan, G., & Schouteten, J. (2021). Emoji for food and beverage research: Pleasure, arousal, and dominance meanings and appropriateness for use. Foods, 10.
  29. Koltsova, E., & Kartashkova, F. (2022). Digital communication and multimodal features: Functioning of emoji in interpersonal communication. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics.
  30. Labov, W. (1966). The linguistic variable as a structural unit.
  31. Lin, F. (2019). Positive or negative: Emoji usage in online social media. In 4th International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2019) (pp. 512–516). Atlantis Press.
  32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986).  But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation.  New Directions For Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84.
  33. Liu, R. (2023). WeChat’s online visual language among Chinese Gen Z: Virtual gifts, aesthetic identity, and affectionate language. Frontiers in Communication.
  34. Ljubeši膰, N., & Fišer, D. (2016). “A global analysis of emoji usage” in paper presented at the proceedings of the 10th web as corpus workshop.
  35. Mateo, J. (2022). 45 million messenger calls are recorded daily in the Philippines. OneNews.PH. Retrieved from
  36. Moschini, I. (2016). The “face with tears of joy” emoji. A socio-semiotic and multimodal insight into Japan-
  37. America mash-up. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 55, 11–25.
  38. Novak, P., Smailovic, J., Sluban, B., & Mozeti膷, I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PLoS ONE, 10.
  39. Nurjamin, A., Masita, E., Lisetyo, A., Dharta, F. Y., Mumfangati, T., Saputra, N., & Andiyan, A. (2023). The millennial generation and the caption language of social media. Migration Letters, 20(8), 157-168.
  40. Peirce, C. S. (1905). What pragmatism is. The Monist, 161–181.  
  41. PrakashYadav, G., & Rai, J. (2017). The generation Z and their social media usage: A review and a research outline. Global Journal Of Enterprise Information Systems, 9(2), 110–116.
  42. Rashdi, F. (2018). Forms and functions of emojis in whatsapp interaction among O. Georgetown University-graduate school of arts & sciences.
  43. Riordan, M. (2017). Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36, 549–567.
  44. Sampietro, A. (2019). Emoji and rapport management in Spanish whatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics.
  45. Shamim, F., & Riaz, M. N. (2023). Impact of multimodal digital media communication on generation Z’s language use and literacy practices. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 398–409.
  46. Siagian, N. R., & Yuliana, N. (2023). The role of social media in generation Z communication. Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation, 1(3), 109-118.
  47. Sugiyama, S. (2015). Kawaii meiru and maroyaka neko: Mobile emoji for relationship maintenance and aesthetic expressions among Japanese teens. First Monday, 20. .
  48. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. (2018). Emoticon, emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communications: Understanding its communicative function, impact, user behavior, and motive,191–201.
  49. Terras, L., & Touat, S. (2021). A social semiotic multimodal analysis of the emojis used in students’ facebook interactions (doctoral dissertation, Université Mouloud Mammeri Tizi Ouzou).
  50. Wagner, T., Punyanunt-Carter, N., & McCarthy, E. (2022). Rules, reciprocity, and emojis: An exploratory study on flirtatious texting with romantic partners. Southern Communication Journal, 87, 461 - 475.
  51. Zhang, Y., Herring, S., & Gan, S. (2022). Graph icon evolution on the Chinese social media platform BiliBili. Proceedings of the The Fifth International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   黑料吃瓜网