ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 9 (2025)

Grade 7 Students’ Perceptions of Class Homogenization and Inclusivity and their Relationship to Academic Performance

Vebhie Joy C. Salvan | Jay Fie P. Luzano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The composition of classrooms has become a key focus in educational research due to its significant influence on student learning outcomes. This study employed a quantitative descriptive research design to explore Grade 7 students' perceptions of class homogenization and inclusivity, as well as their relationship to academic performance. Experts validated a self-made questionnaire and pilot-tested with a homogeneous class to assess reliability, yielding a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.925. The results revealed that students in highly homogenized classes have a mean score of 3.8 (SD = 0.326), reflecting a "very high level of agreement" about their positive learning environment. Conversely, students in less homogenized classes indicated a mean score of 3.6 (SD = 0.412), also demonstrating agreement but with more response variability. In an inclusive environment, students in highly homogenized classes scored 3.8 (SD = 0.445), affirming their belief in equal participation and supportive teachers. Students in less homogenized classes scored 3.76 (SD = 0.447), also showing a "very high level of agreement." The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference in academic performance between the two groups: students in highly homogenized classes (Mean = 89.9, SD = 2.82) and less homogenized classes (Mean = 83.2, SD = 4.57), with a statistically significant result (U = 107, p < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed a weak positive relationship between class homogeneity and academic performance (p = 0.313, p = 0.013), whereas the relationship between inclusivity and academic performance was not statistically significant (p = 0.042, p = 0.744). Overall, class homogenization had a measurable effect on academic performance, with students in highly homogenized classes having higher academic scores. Inclusivity was rated highly in both groups; however, no significant relationship was found between inclusivity and academic performance. These findings suggest that educational strategies should consider class composition to enhance students’ academic outcomes.



References:

  1. Alnahdi, G. H. (2020). Inclusive education in Saudi Arabia and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A critical analysis. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(2), 168–180.
  2. Ballen, C. J., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., Searle, J. B., & Zamudio, K. R. (2017). Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), ar56.
  3. Burns, R. B., & Mason, J. (2002). The influence of class composition on student performance. Educational Studies, 28(3), 267–280.
  4. Campoy-Cubillo, M. C. (2019). Functional diversity and the multimodal listening construct. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(2), 204–219.
  5. Deskmate, A., Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2013). The role of classroom environment in student learning. International Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 45–60.
  6. Ertesvåg, S. K., Havik, T., Vaaland, G. S., & Lerang, M. S. (2024). Teachers’ instructional support and students’ peer relationships in the classroom. Teachers and Teaching, 1–15.
  7. Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135.
  8. Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback, and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296.
  9. Hienonen, L., Kallio, J., & Rantala, J. (2018). The effects of class composition on academic performance. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(4), 123–135.
  10. Huang, W., & Zhu, R. (2020). The effect of peers on students’ academic achievement: Evidence from China’s middle schools. Journal of Population Economics, 33(1), 93–136.
  11. Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The advantages and challenges of inclusive education: Striving for equity in the classroom. Journal of Education and Human Development, 13(1), 23–32.
  12. Kuzmina, Y., & Ivanova, A. (2018). The effects of academic class composition on academic progress in elementary school for students with different levels of initial academic abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 43–53.
  13. Lindner, M., Nusser, M., Gehrer, K., & Schwab, S. (2021). The relationship between inclusivity and academic performance in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 635–650.
  14. Manyatsi, T. (2020). Implementation of inclusive education in high schools in Eswatini: Teachers’ preparedness and challenges. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(6), 75–88.
  15. Mavuso, M. F. (2020). Challenges facing teachers in implementing inclusive education in Swaziland’s secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(8), 882–896.
  16. Mazenod, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2018). Nurturing learning or encouraging dependency? Teacher constructions of students in lower attainment groups in English secondary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 53–68.
  17. Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. (2019). The effects of inclusive education on academic and social outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 678–690.
  18. Salehi, M., Khosravi, H., & Khosravi, M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of homogeneous grouping on academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 345–367.
  19. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899.
  20. St. John, E. P., Hu, S., & Fisher, J. (2021). The impact of class composition on student engagement and performance. Journal of Higher Education, 92(1), 45–67.
  21. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education.
  22. Zimmermann, F., Gorges, J., & Ludwig, J. (2023). How tracking affects student motivation and performance: Evidence from a German secondary school reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(1), 93–114.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø